How do I defend against a partition action when one co-tenant files to force the sale of our inherited home? - Pennsylvania
The Short Answer
In Pennsylvania, a co-tenant generally can ask the court to resolve shared ownership of real estate, and that can include a court-ordered sale with the proceeds divided. “Defending” often means showing the court why a forced sale is not appropriate right now (or why a different outcome is fair), and protecting your financial interests if a sale does occur.
What Pennsylvania Law Says
Partition cases are equitable proceedings—meaning the court focuses on a fair result based on the property, the ownership interests, and the parties’ conduct. In inherited-home disputes, partition often overlaps with estate administration issues (for example, whether the estate is still open, whether the personal representative has authority over the property, or whether the property should be handled through Orphans’ Court orders rather than a simple co-tenant dispute).
If the property is still tied up in the estate, Pennsylvania law gives the Court of Common Pleas (through its appropriate division) authority to authorize a sale of real property in certain circumstances and to grant declaratory relief related to real property—issues that can directly affect whether a partition sale is premature or procedurally improper.
The Statute
The primary law to be aware of in inherited-property disputes that intersect with court authority over real estate is 20 Pa.C.S. § 8301.
This statute establishes that the court may authorize the sale (and related relief) involving real property in specified situations—an important legal backdrop when an inherited home is still being administered or when title/authority issues complicate a co-tenant’s attempt to force a sale.
For a broader overview of partition in Pennsylvania (including inherited property), you may also want to read: How Does a Partition Action Work in Pennsylvania (Especially for Inherited Property)?.
Why You Should Speak with an Attorney
Even when a co-tenant has a path to partition, the “right” outcome in court depends heavily on details that can change leverage and results. Legal outcomes often depend on:
- Strict Deadlines: Partition cases move on court schedules, and missing response deadlines can lead to adverse orders (including appointment of a master, sale terms, or loss of arguments).
- Burden of Proof: If you are arguing against a forced sale (or arguing for a particular allocation of proceeds), you may need strong documentation—proof of contributions to mortgage/taxes/repairs, occupancy history, agreements among heirs, and credible valuation evidence.
- Exceptions and Estate Issues: If the estate is still open or title/authority is unclear, the case may implicate court authority over estate real property and whether the dispute belongs in a different posture. Statutory authority like 20 Pa.C.S. § 8301 can become central to how (and where) the property can be sold or controlled.
Trying to handle this alone can lead to avoidable outcomes—like a sale on unfavorable terms, an incorrect division of proceeds, or orders that don’t account for your financial contributions or rights. A Pennsylvania probate/real estate attorney can evaluate whether the partition is procedurally proper, whether estate administration issues change the analysis, and how to protect your share and negotiating position.
Get Connected with a Pennsylvania Attorney
Do not leave your legal outcome to chance. We can connect you with a pre-screened Probate attorney in Pennsylvania to discuss your specific facts and options.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information under Pennsylvania law and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change frequently. For legal advice specific to your situation, please consult with a licensed attorney.