What happens if mediation fails and I need to file a partition action to force the sale of our jointly owned land? (ND) | North Dakota Partition Actions | FastCounsel
ND North Dakota

What happens if mediation fails and I need to file a partition action to force the sale of our jointly owned land? (ND)

What happens if mediation fails and I need to file a partition action to force the sale of our jointly owned land in North Dakota?

Detailed Answer — How partition actions work in North Dakota

If mediation fails and co-owners cannot agree on dividing or selling jointly owned real property, one co-owner can ask a court to force a partition. In North Dakota, partition actions are civil lawsuits filed in district court to divide property among owners or to order its sale when division in kind is impractical.

What law applies?

The statutory rules for partition of real property in North Dakota are found in the North Dakota Century Code. See the chapter on partition for statutory guidance: N.D.C.C. Title 32, Chapter 19 (Partition).

How the court decides whether to divide the land or order sale

The court first considers whether the property can be fairly divided “in kind” so each owner receives a separate portion. If an in-kind division is feasible and fair, the court may order it. If physical division would be impractical, wasteful, or would materially impair the value (for example, with a single-family home on one lot or improvements that cannot be divided), the court typically orders a sale and distributes proceeds among the owners according to their interests and liens.

Typical steps in a partition action

  1. Filing the complaint: A petitioner files a complaint for partition in district court listing all owners and describing the property, ownership shares, and the requested relief (division, sale, or sale after attempted division).
  2. Service and response: All co-owners and parties with recorded interests (mortgages, liens) must be served. Defendants may file answers and counterclaims.
  3. Court investigation and evidence: The court may order appraisals, surveys, or reports to determine value and possible practical divisions.
  4. Appointment of a commissioner or referee: If the court orders division or sale, it may appoint a commissioner to divide the land or a trustee/referee to oversee a sale and handle the proceeds.
  5. Sale process: If the court orders a sale, the sale can be conducted under court supervision. Proceeds pay liens and costs; net proceeds are divided among owners according to legal interests and any court-ordered adjustments.

Who pays for costs, improvements, rents, and liens?

The court allocates costs of the action (filing, title work, appraisals, commissioner fees) among the parties. Mortgages, tax liens, and recorded encumbrances typically must be paid from sale proceeds before distribution. If one co-owner has occupied or improved the property, the court can account for value of use, rents, or expenses and adjust shares when distributing proceeds.

Timescale and likely outcomes

Partition actions vary in length. Simple cases can resolve in a few months; contested cases with valuation disputes, title complications, or complex improvements can take longer. Expect these common outcomes:

  • Division in kind: each owner receives a defined parcel if practical.
  • Court-ordered sale: property is sold and proceeds divided after lien satisfaction and cost reimbursement.
  • Buyout: one owner buys out others for an agreed or court-determined price (often via appraisal evidence).

Practical issues to expect

Be prepared for appraisal disputes, surveys, creditor claims, and potential requests for accounting (who paid taxes, who collected rent, who made improvements). The court has equitable power to resolve these matters and may adjust distributions to reflect payments and benefits among co-owners.

Where to find the statutes

Read the North Dakota partition statutes for statutory language and procedural details: N.D.C.C., Title 32, Chapter 19 — Partition. For procedural rules that govern how to file and serve pleadings, consult the North Dakota court rules and local district court procedures: North Dakota Courts.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about North Dakota partition law and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed North Dakota attorney about your specific situation before taking action.

Helpful Hints — Practical steps if mediation fails

  • Get a current title report and identify all owners and recorded liens before filing.
  • Order a professional appraisal and boundary survey to show value and feasibility of division.
  • Document payments you made (taxes, mortgage, repairs) and any income received from the property (rent) to support accounting requests in the court.
  • Consider a buyout offer: sometimes a negotiated buyout (with escrow and appraisal) costs less than litigation.
  • Ask the court for interim relief if necessary—e.g., injunctions to prevent waste or to require rent collection—while the action proceeds.
  • Talk to a local real estate attorney early to assess costs, likely outcomes, and whether partition is the right strategy.
  • If you proceed, prepare for costs: filing fees, service costs, appraiser and surveyor fees, and court-appointed commissioner or referee fees may apply.
  • Consider whether unresolved mortgages or tax liens will consume much of sale proceeds—this affects whether litigation is worth the expense.
  • Keep communication records with co-owners; courts favor parties who try to resolve disputes without unnecessary litigation.

Final note: A partition action can force a resolution when negotiations and mediation fail, but it can be costly and time-consuming. An attorney can help weigh alternatives (buyout, negotiated sale, or continued mediation) and protect your financial interest during the court process.

Disclaimer: This information is educational only and not legal advice. For guidance tailored to your facts, contact a licensed North Dakota attorney.

The information on this site is for general informational purposes only, may be outdated, and is not legal advice; do not rely on it without consulting your own attorney.