FastCounsel

This section explains the main factors a Michigan probate court will consider when choosing who should administer a decedent’s estate. The explanation assumes no prior legal knowledge and uses plain language. This is educational information only and not legal advice — you should consult a licensed Michigan probate attorney for guidance about any real case.

Who can be appointed

Michigan law gives priority to certain people and respects the decedent’s will if one exists. Common categories the court evaluates include:

• Person named in the will as personal representative or executor (the court usually honors that nomination unless there’s a strong reason not to).
• Surviving spouse.
• Adult children of the decedent.
• Other heirs or interested persons (parents, siblings, more distant relatives) if no spouse or children serve or are available.
• A creditor or other party may be appointed in rare situations, but the court generally prefers family or a nominated representative.

Priority rules and statutory framework

Michigan’s probate statutes lay out priority and procedures for appointing personal representatives. The court follows those rules when multiple people apply or when nobody named in a will is available. For the statutory framework, see the Estates and Protected Individuals Code (EPIC), Chapter 700 of the Michigan Compiled Laws: https://www.legislature.mi.gov/ (search Chapter 700 for appointment and priority provisions).

Key factors the court will consider

When deciding who to appoint, a Michigan probate judge will typically evaluate all of the following:

• Existence of a will and the testator’s nomination. If the decedent left a valid will that names a personal representative, the court usually appoints that person unless they are disqualified or unable to serve.
• Priority among potential appointees. If there’s no will or the nominee cannot serve, Michigan law provides a priority list (spouse, children, etc.). The court follows that list unless someone else is better suited.
• Willingness to serve and availability. The court will appoint someone who is willing and able to take on the duties. A person who declines or cannot perform the duties won’t be appointed.
• Capacity and age. The appointee must be legally competent and of age. A minor or someone legally incapacitated cannot serve.
• Residency and venue considerations. The court looks at where the decedent lived and where the estate proceedings should be handled. While non‑residents can sometimes serve, the court assesses practicality and jurisdictional issues.
• Honesty, trustworthiness, and financial responsibility. Because a personal representative handles money and property, the court considers whether the person can be trusted to manage funds and act in the estate’s and beneficiaries’ best interests.
• Conflicts of interest. The court will avoid appointing someone whose personal interests conflict with their duty to the estate (for example, someone who stands to benefit by acting against other heirs or creditors).
• Criminal history and fiduciary fitness. Convictions for fraud, dishonesty, or other misconduct that bear on trustworthiness can make a candidate unfit. The court may deny appointment if the criminal history suggests a risk to the estate.
• Financial status and bankruptcy. If a candidate is bankrupt, in serious financial trouble, or otherwise unable to post a required bond, the court may choose someone else or require additional protections (like bonding or co‑personal representatives).
• Bond and insurance requirements. The court can require a bond (a kind of insurance) to protect estate assets from mismanagement. If the nominated person cannot get a bond or the court deems a bond necessary, the court may appoint someone who can provide it or set bond conditions.
• Prior relationship and relevant experience. Courts favor appointees who are reasonably close to the decedent (spouse, adult child) or who have relevant experience (former fiduciary, attorney, accountant). Practical ability to handle record‑keeping, tax filings, and distribution matters matters to the judge.
• Waivers and agreements among interested parties. If all heirs or interested parties agree on an appointee and waive the right to object, courts often follow that consensus unless there’s a legal reason not to.
• Pending litigation or disputes. If a proposed appointee is involved in litigation with the estate or has serious disputes with beneficiaries, the court may decline to appoint that person to avoid conflicts while the issues remain unresolved.

How the court resolves competing claims

If multiple people seek appointment, the court compares the candidates against the statutory priority list and the factors above. The judge may:

• appoint the highest‑priority willing and qualified person,
• require a bond or conditions,
• appoint co‑personal representatives to share duties, or
• deny an appointment if the person is disqualified and choose the next eligible person.

Practical examples (hypothetical)

Example 1: A decedent left a valid will naming a niece as personal representative. The niece lives out of state, is willing to serve, and can post bond. Unless she is disqualified, the probate court will typically appoint her despite non‑residency.

Example 2: No will exists. The surviving spouse wants to serve, but has a recent conviction for fraud involving finances. The court might decline the spouse and appoint an adult child or an independent professional, or require a bond and greater oversight.

Where to find the law

Michigan’s Estates and Protected Individuals Code (EPIC) contains the statutory rules for appointment, qualifications, duties, bonds, and disqualifications. For the text of relevant provisions, search Chapter 700 on the Michigan Legislature website: https://www.legislature.mi.gov/ (search for Chapter 700 — Estates and Protected Individuals Code).

Important: This article summarizes common factors and procedures. Actual cases can turn on small facts or procedural rules. If you are involved in a Michigan probate matter, contact a Michigan probate attorney promptly.